This week Jesus gives his disciples the parable of the dishonest
manager. Scholars, preachers and teachers have a myriad of difficulties with
this text. Why did the master of the dishonest manager commend him? Some say it
has to do with being shrewd in times when shrewdness is needed. What if the
dishonest manager is otherwise a good husband, father, or mother? Are we to
write the person off as a bad person? What about the teaching that one who is
dishonest in a very little is dishonest in much? Or, the flip side, one who is faithful in a very little is faithful
in much? How do we reconcile these teachings? How are we
reconciled in conflicts within ourselves, and with others? Humans are complex,
not just simply one thing or another.
What about forgiveness? Can one serve both wealth
and God?
The Rev. Marshall A. Jolly in "Shrewdness," calls attention to our tendency to label
people, saying, " We have labels...: a
person who commits a crime ceases to be a person and instead becomes a criminal
or an inmate. A person who enters the country illegally is reduced to an
illegal immigrant. A person caught in the cycle of addiction disintegrates into
the lexicon of addict or user or pill head. The language we use to refer to
people whose behavior we find morally or ethically objectionable betrays us.
They become something less than a person; something unworthy or unfit for our
care and concern." Words matter. How often do the rich blame the poor for their poverty? How often do we blame the victim? For a comprehensive look at Jesus' parable see Dan Clendenin's "Lovers of Money"